For those of you interested in others who have made the journey from the Far East to the Truth of Orthodoxy, here's a link that may be of interest:
http://journeytoorthodoxy.com/category/convert-stories/non-theists/buddhists/
It is on the website "Journey to Orthodoxy"—which has some other great pages, as well.
Orthodox Asceticism and Spirituality for the Modern World
Orthodox Asceticism and Spirituality for the Modern World
Monday, July 30, 2012
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Orthodoxy and the Noble Eightfold Path, Part One
What follows in this article is not a syncretic blend of Buddhism and Orthodox Christian
spirituality. However, it does use
the Noble Eightfold Path as a
guide for living the Orthodox way of life. And—it must be noted—that the Noble Eightfold Path offers a
very good vehicle for transmitting the wisdom of a particular religious
tradition, whatever that tradition may be.
Before we get much further, a little
backtracking needs to take place on my part. So here goes…
Before I started this blog, I had ideas
for several blogs—primarily because I thought I had the ideas for several
really cool blog titles. One of
them that I thought had a particularly good ring to it was going to be “From
East to East.” (The other one that
I really liked was “Hardcore Christianity: Kick-Ass Asceticism for Orthodox
Christians Living in the 21st Century”—but I digress.) The blog idea “From East to East” had a
particular resonance with me for a couple of reasons. One, I always enjoyed Eastern
philosophy—and still do; I think it has quite a lot to offer modern man. Two, coming to Orthodoxy from Eastern philosophy, I realize how well the religions of the East
(primarily Buddhism and Taoism) actually prepared me for Orthodoxy. For those who come to Orthodoxy from
one of the Western forms of Christianity—whether its Protestantism or
Catholicism—there are several stumbling blocks that are difficult for many to
get around: the nature of Original Sin, and therefore the meaning of Christ’s
atonement, and just what the Paschal mystery actually means; the notion of salvation as an
ever-ongoing conversion which will lead us to theosis, to name just a
couple. However, if you had
already decided that the Western theological concepts have no (or very little)
meaning for you—which you surely must do if you are going to take an interest
in the philosophy cum religions of the East—then there aren’t very many
stumbling blocks (or at least there are different stumbling blocks) that will prevent you from
adopting Orthodoxy’s theological underpinnings. In fact, you will find a concept such as theosis particularly gratifying and satisfying to your
intellectual palate—it seems so close to the Buddhist and Taoist understanding
of enlightenment; in fact,
theosis is often described as
enlightenment. And third, I knew
that my understanding of both Eastern philosophy and Orthodoxy (both which are,
I must admit, not that in-depth)
could help as a sort of catechesis for those readers who, although they are
currently practicing Eastern philosophy, still have a yearning for
Christ—whether that yearning may be small or large.
However, I decided against doing several
blogs because I thought that I might not have enough material to regularly update
each one. With that being said, I
still want to write the occasional article dealing with the intersection of Far
Eastern religions and Eastern Christianity.
Hence, the article you are staring at on
your computer screen.
Before we get to the meat of this article,
and what an Orthodox Eightfold Path would look like, I think it’s important to
discuss some of the similarities and the differences between Eastern
Christianity and the Buddhist religion.
Here are a few (and perhaps we will discuss these and others in more
depth in a future article):
- They are both “practitioner’s religions.” And I think this may be what can best attract followers of Eastern religions to Orthodoxy compared to other forms of Christianity. What I mean by a “practitioner’s religion” is that—although both of these religions have beliefs, very different and important beliefs—they are rooted in practice. Buddhists are expected to meditate regularly, practice mindfulness, and train in compassion (to name a few). The Orthodox are expected to pray daily (in both a contemplative and discursive manner), fast regularly, practice watchfulness (almost the exact same thing as mindfulness), and engage in other ascetic disciplines.
- Neither of these religions have the goal of “getting saved” as the penultimate achievement. What turns off many Westerners from the Christianity that they were raised in (or exposed to) is the idea that the goal of being a Christian is to just “accept the Lord Jesus Christ as your personal savior” and then you’re done. (And then, of course, you can listen to the ongoing debate over “once saved, always saved” and other such nonsense.) For the Buddhist, “salvation” is achieved by attaining enlightenment. For the Orthodox Christian, to achieve salvation is to attain theosis, or union with God—nothing else will cut it. Theosis is similar to enlightenment, except that union is achieved with a Personal God: our Savior, Jesus Christ.
- Both of these religions have a healthy distrust of the self. In fact, I can think of no other religions—outside of Orthodoxy and Buddhism—that view the notion of the self in such similar ways. In Western Christianity, for instance, there is often a lot of talk on how you need to get in touch with your inmost self, or discussion that the ultimate good comes from your inner self. Only Buddhism and Orthodoxy claim that this is a bunch of hogwash. Buddhism says that you lack an intrinsic, inherently independent self, while Orthodoxy claims that the self is simply not to be trusted, because the Truth is that you are not what you take “your self” to be. You are not your body. You are not your mind. You are your soul. As Saint Macarius the Great (c. 300- c.390) said, “The heart is such a small vessel; and yet dragons and lions are there, and there poisonous creatures and all the treasures of wickedness; rough, and uneven paths are there, and gaping chasms.”
Now, before we get into the Eightfold
Path, I want to discourage anyone from trying to practice more than one
religion at the same time. It
won’t work, and, to be honest, it does a disservice to both religions. And to back up my point, I offer the
following quote, not from an Orthodox theologian, but from the esteemed
Buddhist scholar Bikkhu Bodhi:
“One approach to resolving this problem
that is popular today is the eclectic one: to pick and choose from the various
traditions whatever seems amenable to our needs, welding together different
practices and techniques into a synthetic whole that is personally satisfying. Thus
one may combine Buddhist mindfulness meditation with sessions of Hindu mantra
recitation, Christian prayer with Sufi dancing, Jewish Kabbala with Tibetan
visualization exercises. Eclecticism, however, though sometimes helpful in
making a transition from a predominantly worldly and materialistic way of life
to one that takes on a spiritual hue, eventually wears thin. While it makes a
comfortable halfway house, it is not comfortable as a final vehicle.
“There are two interrelated flaws in
eclecticism that account for its ultimate inadequacy. One is that eclecticism
compromises the very traditions it draws upon. The great spiritual traditions
themselves do not propose their disciplines as independent techniques that may
be excised from their setting and freely recombined to enhance the felt quality
of our lives. They present them, rather, as parts of an integral whole, of a
coherent vision regarding the fundamental nature of reality and the final goal
of the spiritual quest. A spiritual tradition is not a shallow stream in which
one can wet one's feet and then beat a quick retreat to the shore. It is a
mighty, tumultuous river which would rush through the entire landscape of one's
life, and if one truly wishes to travel on it, one must be courageous enough to
launch one's boat and head out for the depths.
“The second defect in eclecticism follows
from the first. As spiritual practices are built upon visions regarding the
nature of reality and the final good, these visions are not mutually compatible.
When we honestly examine the teachings of these traditions, we will find that
major differences in perspective reveal themselves to our sight, differences
which cannot be easily dismissed as alternative ways of saying the same thing.
Rather, they point to very different experiences constituting the supreme goal
and the path that must be trodden to reach that goal.”[i]
I hope that settles that. Now, on to the Path:
The Orthodox Eightfold Path
The Eightfold Path has—as the name
implies—eight “limbs” to it. They
are: right view, right thoughts, right speech, right action, right livelihood,
right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration. They are not meant to follow one after
another, as steps that you are to climb.
Rather, they are meant more as spokes on a wheel. Each spoke relies on the other, and the
wheel can really only have its full strength when none of the spokes are
missing.
Right View
This is always the first limb on the
path. In fact, without this limb,
the other steps on the path will eventually fall apart.
For the Buddhist, right view would mean
the “Four Noble Truths”. Or, at
least, it would mean the Four Noble Truths as a starting point, though it might
also contain the “Three Treasures” of the Dharma: non-self, impermanence, and
suffering. If you don’t believe in
the Four Noble Truths, along with the “truths” of non-self, impermanence, and
suffering, you can’t rightly call yourself a Buddhist.
For the Orthodox, right view must mean several different things. First, it means that we have faith
in the Creed, which all Orthodox Christians
recite at every Divine Liturgy. In
fact, the minimum that is required of anyone wanting to convert to the Orthodox
faith is belief in the Creed.
But the Creed should also be a starting
point. Another thing we need to
have for right view is a “Patristic mind.” For the Orthodox Christian, to put on the “mind of Christ”
is also to put on the “mind” of the Holy Fathers of the Church. And to put on the “mind” of the Fathers
of the Church we need to read and study what they had to say—for what they said
in the past is not relegated to some bygone era. Rather, it is actually applicable to our lives in the 21st
century. The Patristic teachings
need to be looked at seriously, then applied to our current lives.
In addition to the Fathers of the Church,
we need a firm foundation in Holy Scripture. We need to read scripture, realizing that it too speaks to
our lives in these modern times.
Saint Tikhon of Zadonsk says, “Whenever you read the Gospel, Christ
Himself is speaking to you. And
while you read, you are speaking and talking to Him.”
In addition to Scripture, Church Fathers,
and the beliefs that we hold to be Truth, we also need to study and read as
much as possible from many different traditionally Orthodox sources. In this way, our mind is slowly transformed into a
Patristic, Orthodox mind.
Right Thoughts
“It’s no mystery that thinking can make
us happy or miserable. Let’s say
you’re sitting under a tree one fine spring day. Nothing particular is happening to you, except perhaps the
breeze is ruffling your hair, yet in your mind you’re far away. Maybe you’re remembering another spring
day several years back when you were feeling terrible. You had just lost a job, or failed an
exam, or your cat had wandered off.
That memory turns into a worry.
‘What if I lose my job again?
Why did I ever say such-and-such to so-and-so? No doubt this or that will happen and I’ll be out on my
ear. Now I’m really in for it! How will I pay my bills?’ One worry brings up another, which
brings up another. Soon you feel
your life is in shambles, but all this while you’ve been sitting under a tree.”[ii]
When you have the correct view to begin
with, your mind will naturally flow into thoughts that are correct. And when you practice the other steps
on the Path, your mind will naturally flow into what is Good and True. This is another aspect in which
Orthodoxy has the “advantage” over other forms of Christianity. I know many Protestants who believe
they have the correct view, but their internal lives do not show the fruit of
such beliefs. They are no more at
peace internally than anyone else.
(In fact, I know atheists who are more at peace than many theists.)
When Orthodoxy is practiced sincerely and
fervently—a life rooted in taking part in all of the Sacraments, in other
words, a life rooted in the Church, along with daily prayer—your mind
begins to truly change because you change your thoughts. Change your thoughts and you change
your mind.
But our thoughts also aid in the rest of our lives. Our thoughts change how we approach
Divine Liturgy, for instance. When
we want to participate in the
life of the Church, when we believe
that the Body and Blood of our Savior are truly found within the Sacrament of
communion, then the liturgy becomes divine.
And the same goes for the rest of our
Orthodox lives. Here are the words
of Elder Thaddeus of Vitovnika:
“Our life depends on the kind of
thoughts we nurture. If our thoughts are peaceful, calm, meek, and kind, then
that is what our life is like. If
our attention is turned to the circumstances in which we live, we are drawn
into a whirlpool of thoughts, and can have neither peace nor tranquility.
“Everything, both good and evil,
comes from our thoughts. Our
thoughts become reality. Even
today we can see that all of creation, everything that exists on earth and in
the cosmos, is nothing but Divine thought made material in time and space. We humans were created in the image of
God. Mankind was given a great
gift, but we hardly understand that.
God’s energy and life are in us, but we do not realize it. Neither do we understand that we
greatly influence others with our thoughts. We can be very good or very evil, depending on the kind of
thoughts and desires we breed.
“If our thoughts are kind, peaceful, and
quiet, turned only toward good, then we also influence ourselves and radiate
peace all around us—in the family, in our whole country, everywhere.”[iii]
Right Speech
“Think how often you say to yourself,
‘If only I hadn’t said that,’ or something like, ‘When I saw the look on her
face, I knew that what I said had hurt her feelings.’ Wrong speech causes us many problems. We lie and then get caught in it; we
say something nasty about a co-worker and get him into trouble; we speak
inconsiderately and offend a client or friend; we spend a whole day in
meaningless chatter and get nothing done.”[iv]
You should notice at this point how right
view flows into right thoughts, and right thoughts naturally flow into right
speech. In fact, right speech is nothing more than a natural outflow
of the other two. It’s also why
it’s impossible to practice right speech if you’re not first practicing the
other two steps.
Many who were raised in a Protestant
upbringing (as I was) may notice that Protestants often behave as if doing
something or not doing something (we’ll get around to right action momentarily) or saying something or not saying
something somehow makes him or her holy.
However, right speech and right action have nothing holy about them if they are not predicated upon
right thoughts. What does it
matter if you say or do something “holy” if your thoughts are not peaceful and
kind?
When outlining the Noble Eightfold Path,
the Buddha said that right speech has four qualities: It is always
truthful. It is never malicious or
unkind. It is gentle, not crude or
harsh. It is moderate, not useless
or meaningless.[v]
In Part Two, we will conclude with the remaining five steps on the Path.
[i] “The Noble
Eightfold Path: The Way to End Suffering” by Bikkhu Bodhi. The Buddhist Publication Society
[ii] “Eight
Mindful Steps to Happiness: Walking the Buddha’s Path,” by Bhante Henepola
Gunaratana. Gunaratana translates
the second step on the Path as “skillful thinking.”
[iii] “Our
Thoughts Determine Our Lives: The Life and Teachings of Elder Thaddeus of
Vitovnika.”
[iv] “Eight
Mindful Steps to Happiness: Walking the Buddha’s Path,” by Bhante Henepola
Gunaratana.
[v] ibid
Monday, July 16, 2012
Intimacy with God
"I have run to the fragrance of your myrrh, O Christ God,
for I have been wounded by your love;
for I have been wounded by your love;
do not part from me, O heavenly Bridegroom"
~Elder Porphyrios
Jesus tells us that the Kingdom of
God is within us. For most of us
who spent our lives in church, there’s nothing amazing about this
statement. It’s been bantered about
so much that it’s become cliché.
And, well, even though most people have heard it, very few have actually
listened. But the fact is this: these might be the most important
words in all the Bible.
The Kingdom of God is within us.
In other words, our soul is made for
intimacy with God. We were created
for union with the Divine.
Within us all is a Living Center. It calls out for God. And He calls out for us.
Our Father doesn’t just call out to us,
but he yearns for us. And the truth is that we yearn for him,
whether we know it or not.
If we don’t answer this yearning, then our
lives are incomplete. Without God,
there is a disconnect with this Living Center that dwells within. And we will try to fill it with all
sorts of stuff.
But stuff will never satisfy. Only the Living God who desires us
because he has made us for Him will suffice.
Nothing else will do.
And that’s what this blog is really all about. It’s about the longing in our hearts,
the yearning of our souls, the intimacy that we crave, and the things we need
to do in order to embrace it. And,
yes, it’s also about all of the other things that we fill our lives with;
things that we fill our lives with in order to avoid He Who loves us, or run
from Him, or just because we try to admit that we are ignorant of His longing
and ours.
At the beginning of the world, when man
was created, God breathed Life into our souls. Our souls are the part of us that are immortal. Our souls were made for God.
Theosis:
Let’s Start at the End to Understand the Beginning
In the Orthodox Christian tradition, salvation is seen a bit different than it is in the West. In the Christian traditions of the West
(whether Protestant or Catholic), salvation is too often based on either
believing the right thing (Protestant) or doing the right thing(s) (Catholic). If you either believe the right things
or do the right things, then you will “get saved”—salvation, in this case,
meaning that you get to go to heaven when you die. (Okay, I realize that I’m engaging in a bit of
oversimplification. Many Protestants
and Catholics that don’t think in such a manner—but still, there are many that
do.)
Salvation, for the Orthodox, is much more
organic than that. It’s not a
black and white thing. Rather,
it’s a process. And true salvation is called theosis, often translated as “union with God.” (See my post below.)
(In this case, salvation is actually the
end of the journey. It’s not the
beginning, leaving you to then say, “now what?”)
I love the idea of theosis. It just makes sense.
God is Infinite Love Who loves us
infinitely. And because He loves
us, He desires to know us intimately.
And because He desires to know us, because
He dwells in us, He wants us to dwell in Him. So He came in flesh and blood. He incarnated to allow us to dwell in His Triune Nature.
He didn’t send a prophet. He didn’t send a messenger. He sent Himself.
That’s a God I can love. That’s a God that I want to join in union with, to embrace, to know.
I understand (I’m not that foolish, after all) that many in our world don’t
feel as I do. Many people have
been exposed to bad religion, to a poor understanding of God, to other people
who are supposed to represent God, but instead make little more than a mockery
of Him.
If you think God is vengeful, spiteful,
full of wrath and fury, full of hate,
then obviously that’s not a God that you want to love, much less join in
intimate union.
But God is not those things. God is one thing, and one thing only:
He is love. Love is His Nature. And It is a love that is without
beginning and without end. (And if
He is furious, then it is a fury that He has for me and for you. It is—as Brennan Manning would have put
it—a furious longing for us.)
The Beatles said it best: All you need is
love. It is love that will lead
you to Him, it is His love that will draw you. It is love that allows for theosis to begin to work its
wondrous grace.
And you can’t fill it with any other
substitute. Only the pure thing
will do.
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Theosis
"God became man so that man might become god." -Saint Athanasius of Alexandria
If there is one thing that distinguishes Orthodoxy from the Christianity of the West (whether Protestant or Catholic) it is the idea of theosis. Theosis—also referred to as "deification" or "divinization"—is nothing other than salvation for the Orthodox Christian.
And for a lot of Westerners who begin to investigate Orthodoxy, it can also become a real stumbling block.
I've been wanting to write about theosis for the last several days (but was having trouble putting my thoughts on paper) when I came across the following from Frederica Matthewes-Green. Her explanation is as good as anything that I've read, while remaining relatively "untechnical" and jargon-free:
"In Western theology, the word salvation immediately raises an image of the crucified Christ. His death on the cross reunited us with God the Father, paying Him the debt for our sins. Christians of St. Andrew's world would have seen things from a slightly different angle. For them, salvation is being restored to the image and likeness of God. It means God dwelling within us and filling us with His presence.
"Now, sometimes we say this in Western Christianity, but I think we don't mean it as literally as they did. For them, God's presence in us is like the fire in the Burning Bush. It gradually takes us over, so that although we remain fully ourselves, we are being made over into our true selves, the way God originally intended us to be. He is Light, and we are filled with His light—maybe even literally, as some saints were said to visibly glow. The term for this transformation is fairly scandalizing: theosis, which means being transformed into God, divinized or deified. Of course, we do not become little mini-gods with our own universes. We never lose our identity, but we are filled with God like a sponge is filled with water.
"This is the reason Christ came. Theosis is the goal of life for every human being... It is a biblical idea, too. When Saint Paul talked about being "in Christ," or Christ being "in me," he meant it literally. That's how his words were understood by people who lived in his world and spoke his language, the ones who were his original audience."
This quote is taken from Matthewes-Green's book "First Fruits of Prayer: A Forty-Day Journey Through the Canon of St. Andrew."
If there is one thing that distinguishes Orthodoxy from the Christianity of the West (whether Protestant or Catholic) it is the idea of theosis. Theosis—also referred to as "deification" or "divinization"—is nothing other than salvation for the Orthodox Christian.
And for a lot of Westerners who begin to investigate Orthodoxy, it can also become a real stumbling block.
I've been wanting to write about theosis for the last several days (but was having trouble putting my thoughts on paper) when I came across the following from Frederica Matthewes-Green. Her explanation is as good as anything that I've read, while remaining relatively "untechnical" and jargon-free:
"In Western theology, the word salvation immediately raises an image of the crucified Christ. His death on the cross reunited us with God the Father, paying Him the debt for our sins. Christians of St. Andrew's world would have seen things from a slightly different angle. For them, salvation is being restored to the image and likeness of God. It means God dwelling within us and filling us with His presence.
"Now, sometimes we say this in Western Christianity, but I think we don't mean it as literally as they did. For them, God's presence in us is like the fire in the Burning Bush. It gradually takes us over, so that although we remain fully ourselves, we are being made over into our true selves, the way God originally intended us to be. He is Light, and we are filled with His light—maybe even literally, as some saints were said to visibly glow. The term for this transformation is fairly scandalizing: theosis, which means being transformed into God, divinized or deified. Of course, we do not become little mini-gods with our own universes. We never lose our identity, but we are filled with God like a sponge is filled with water.
"This is the reason Christ came. Theosis is the goal of life for every human being... It is a biblical idea, too. When Saint Paul talked about being "in Christ," or Christ being "in me," he meant it literally. That's how his words were understood by people who lived in his world and spoke his language, the ones who were his original audience."
This quote is taken from Matthewes-Green's book "First Fruits of Prayer: A Forty-Day Journey Through the Canon of St. Andrew."
Through the Eastern Gate - From Tibetan Buddhism to Orthodox Christianity
For those of you interested in (or even practicing) Asian religions, the following article may be of interest to you. It's the story of a serious practitioner of Tibetan Buddhism who made the journey to the Orthodox Church:
http://www.pravmir.com/article_216.html
http://www.pravmir.com/article_216.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)